Skip to main content
Anti-fraud scoring

Fewer followers.
Still a fair shot at the top.

Watch how engagement-weighted scoring lets authentic micro creators outrank big accounts with weak interaction — the same math protects brands from fake reach.

Scroll to see the comparison animate in step by step

What actually moves the needle

Three ideas behind every campaign score — built for creators and brands who care about truth, not flex.

01

Not follower count

Reach alone doesn’t move the leaderboard. Vanity metrics can’t buy a fair win.

02

Verified engagement

Likes, comments, and shares come from official APIs — never screenshots or self-reporting.

03

Weighted score

Score = views × engagement rate. Real audiences compound; hollow views collapse.

Followers look impressive — until you chart what counts

Same two creators through the lens of audience size, then engagement, then final score.

Step 1 — Follower reach (not the score)

Creator A

Niche, loyal

12.4K

Creator B

Large, broad

890K

Step 2 — Engagement rate (API-verified)

Creator A

10.2%

Real comments & shares per view

Creator B

2.0%

Views without proportional engagement

Step 3 — The scoreboard

Views × engagement = score

// Engagement Weighted Score

Score = Views × Engagement Rate

where

Engagement Rate =

(Likes + Comments + Shares)

Total Views

Bot detection 24h cooldown API-verified

Final weighted score

10,200

Creator A · wins

4,000

Creator B

Half the views, ~5× the engagement quality — that's the upset on the board.

Ready to play on a fair field?

Creators compete on verified performance. Brands fund outcomes, not guesswork.

Back to home